Case 1800774/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Smith v Skanska plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800774/2019
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's employment ended on 6 August 2018 when he was made redundant, which the tribunal noted amounted in law to a dismissal. He wanted to challenge that dismissal as unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and went through mandatory early conciliation between 5 November 2018 and 19 December 2018. The tribunal recorded that the limitation period for presenting the unfair dismissal claim expired on 19 January 2019, but the claim was not presented until 20 February 2019, making it one month and one day out of time.
The hearing was listed to decide whether the claim had been presented out of time and, if so, whether it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time and had then been brought within a reasonable time. The claimant said he had been very poorly for about four weeks in January 2019 and referred to having pneumonia and shingles. He also stated that, although age and disability were mentioned in the claim form, he was not pursuing any discrimination complaints based on those characteristics.
After hearing from both sides, the tribunal adjourned the limitation issue and indicated that it would give directions for a witness statement and medical evidence. The claimant then raised the possibility of withdrawing the case, was given time to consider that position, and confirmed that he wished to withdraw. The tribunal accordingly dismissed the unfair dismissal claim following that withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the complaint; no merits decision was reached. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- reasonable time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.