Case 1800792/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Jhalli v Middlewood Nature Nursery Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2026
- Case reference
- 1800792/2025
- Decision date
- 4 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Jhalli
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shulman, sitting at Leeds by CVP, heard the claim with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by Mr R Hindle of Forest Schools Kindergarten Limited. The claimant alleged unauthorised deduction of wages, with monies in question having been paid by the claimant to FSK (the respondent's associated company) in respect of a child care bill, the funds for that payment ultimately coming from the respondent.
The judge found the claimant unprepared, confused about the amount and timing of any deduction, and that she had insisted on lack of consent before later telling the Tribunal that she did agree. In those circumstances the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claimant changed her account on consent and was confused about amount and timing; claim dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.