Case 1800804/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Blakemore v Tableserv Ltd ( In Voluntary Liquiidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800804/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Blakemore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 27 January 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Rogerson determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 24 April 2023 was cancelled.
On the substance, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £595 gross for that claim. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £833 gross.
The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any additional remedy beyond those two gross sums. The total sum payable on the face of the judgment is £1,428 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £595 gross. | Upheld | — | £595 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £833 gross. | Upheld | — | £833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,428
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.