Case 1800809/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Crawshaw v Daves Aquarium Limited Introduction/ — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800809/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Crawshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was sent to the respondent's registered office on 18 March 2024. No response was presented by the return date or at all, and no application for an extension of time was made. Employment Judge JM Wade determined that there was sufficient information on file to give judgment in the notice pay and redundancy payment claims, and that, in the interests of justice, the unlawful deductions of wages complaint could also be disposed of by Rule 21 judgment in the absence of any defence.
The tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment in the claimant's favour on all three complaints. The redundancy payment claim succeeded in the gross sum of £4,617; the notice pay claim succeeded in the gross sum of £2,736; and the unlawful deduction of wages complaint succeeded in the gross sum of £23,092.44. The judgment recorded the total payable by the respondent as £20,160.
The unlawful deductions complaint concerned a series of deductions in which tax and national insurance were deducted from the claimant's pay but not paid over to HMRC, with liability said to have passed on a TUPE transfer of a shop from previous employing companies founded by the same person. The judgment characterised this as complex but disposable under Rule 21 given the absence of any defence.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment in absence of response; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £4,617 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded under Rule 21; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,736 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Series of deductions (tax and NI deducted but not paid to HMRC); liability passed on TUPE transfer from previous employing companies founded by the same person. Gross sum £23,092.44 rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £23,092 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,160
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.