Case 1800811/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Represented himself For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 1800811/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Represented himself For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr T Benn’s unfair dismissal claim and made a monetary award against Hiiroc X Developments Limited at the hearing on 24 January 2025. Employment Judge James Representation recorded a basic award of £1,929 and a compensatory award of £2,960.31.
The compensatory award was broken down as £500 for loss of statutory rights, £164.59 for loss of pension contributions, and £2,295.72 for loss of wages. The judgment states that the prescribed element was £2,295.72 and was attributable to the period 30 November 2023 to 24 January 2025.
The total monetary award was £4,889.31. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so this document records the outcome and remedy but not the tribunal’s detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,889 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,889
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,929
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,960
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.