Case 1800820/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Wilson v GC’s Cafe Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800820/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment in case numbers 1800820/2019 and 1800821/2019. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant.
The written record does not set out any findings on liability, does not give reasons on the merits, and records no monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than the written judgment text. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than the written judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than the written judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.