Case 1800832/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Fleming v Jack and Jill Bath Co. Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800832/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Fleming
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNeither party attended the hearing on 25 April 2023. The tribunal noted that the respondent had not filed a response and the claimant could not be reached by telephone, and it decided it was in the interests of justice and proportionate to proceed in the parties' absence.
The claim was for unpaid holiday pay, expressed in the judgment as an unlawful deductions from wages claim. On the basis of the claim form, the tribunal found that the claimant started work on 1 April 2021 and that the effective date of termination was 1 October 2022. It found that he was paid £2,400 gross per month, worked 40 hours per week, and therefore inferred that he worked five days a week.
The tribunal found that the claimant took five days' holiday in the last holiday year and was not paid for any untaken holiday at the end of employment. Because the start of the holiday year had not been specified, the tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the holiday year started on the date employment began, 1 April.
Using those facts, the tribunal calculated the unpaid untaken holiday as 9.2 days. It accepted an annual gross pay figure of £28,800, a weekly gross pay figure of £553.85, and a daily gross pay figure of £110.77. It applied the statutory minimum holiday entitlement of 5.6 weeks or 28 days per year, calculated entitlement for the period 1 April 2022 to 1 October 2022 as 14.2 days, deducted the five days taken, and awarded £1,019.08.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as an unlawful deductions from wages claim for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,019 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.