Case 1800834/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Laura Robinson v Training Aim Academy Ltd and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800834/2023
- Decision date
- 26 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs Laura Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 26 April 2023, Employment Judge D N Jones recorded that the first respondent, Training Aim Academy Ltd, had made unauthorised deductions from Mrs Laura Robinson's wages in respect of remuneration and holiday pay. The tribunal upheld that claim and ordered the first respondent to pay £2,153.84 gross, subject to statutory deductions.
The tribunal also found that the first respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment. It ordered payment of £1,723.08, stated to be four weeks' pay, for breach of that legal obligation. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of remuneration and holiday pay; award stated gross and subject to statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £2,154 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment; award stated to be four weeks' pay for breach of that legal obligation. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,877
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.