Case 1800835/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gulzamir v Synergy Health Managed Services Limited, trading as Synergy LMS — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800835/2022
- Decision date
- 11 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gulzamir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under rule 21 because the respondent submitted no response, and it was satisfied that a determination could properly be made on the material available. It found that Mr M Gulzamir was unfairly dismissed by Synergy Health Managed Services Limited, trading as Synergy LMS.
The judgment states that the dismissal was unfair under general principles on the ground that the claimant made protected disclosures, and also because he brought to the respondent's attention by reasonable means circumstances connected with his work which he reasonably believed were harmful or potentially harmful to health and safety. No separate findings are set out on liability beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal awarded £5,854.46 in compensation, comprising a basic award of £1,073 and a compensatory award of £4,781.46. The compensatory award included past losses of £2,201.46, future losses of £2,080 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. Recoupment provisions apply; the prescribed element was £2,201.46 for the period 25 November 2021 to 26 April 2022, and the award exceeded that prescribed element by £3,653.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent filed no response and the tribunal was satisfied it could determine the matter on the available material. The dismissal was found unfair on the grounds that the claimant made protected disclosures and, separately, that he brought to the respondent's attention by reasonable means circumstances connected with work which he reasonably believed were harmful or potentially harmful to health and safety. | Upheld | — | £5,854 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,854
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,073
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,781
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.