Case 1800848/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Elahi, Operations Manager — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800848/2021
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Toea Giurgea brought claims against Highgrove Beds Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages in October 2020, refusal to permit the exercise of the right to annual leave, and unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 5 December 2020 to 12 February 2021. The case was heard by Employment Judge Cox at Leeds on 27 January 2022.
The October 2020 deductions claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The annual leave claim failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages covering 5 December 2020 to 12 February 2021 and ordered the respondent to pay £1,704.15 in respect of those deductions.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deductions from wages in October 2020 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claim of refusal to permit the exercise of the right to annual leave failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deductions from wages for the period from 5 December 2020 to 12 February 2021 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,704 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,704
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.