Case 1800857/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. T Anandakrishnan v SAMY Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800857/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. T Anandakrishnan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent on a preliminary issue heard on 21 March 2022 before Employment Judge Buckley in Leeds by CVP. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Roddy, a paralegal.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was an employee and a worker of the respondent for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010. No substantive liability findings, remedies, or compensation figures were recorded in the written decision.
The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further adjudication is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent on a preliminary issue. The tribunal found that the claimant was an employee and a worker of the respondent for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.