Case 1800869/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Wright v Classico Italiano Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800869/2022
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Wright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Wright brought a breach of contract complaint against Classico Italiano Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The hearing was held at Leeds by CVP on 21 April 2022 before Employment Judge Anderson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending or being represented.
The tribunal considered the claimant's written documentation, including a copy of the contract, and heard evidence from him under oath. It also recorded that the liquidators confirmed they did not intend to defend the claim. On that basis, the tribunal found the breach of contract complaint well founded and it succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Wright £7,666.64 gross. It stated that the claimant was responsible for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal considered the claimant's written documentation, including a copy of the contract, and oral evidence from the claimant. It also received confirmation that the liquidators did not intend to defend the claim. | Upheld | — | £7,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,667
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.