Case 1800870/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hemstock v Millhouses Accountancy Ltd PUBLIC HEARING Heard: BY CVP On: 21 April 2022 — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800870/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hemstock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely by CVP on 21 April 2022 before Employment Judge JM Wade. The claimant attended in person. The respondent did not attend, after an error in the virtual hearing link was corrected and calls and an email were sent to the respondent; the tribunal waited until 2.30pm and then proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47. The claimant had complied with the pre-hearing directions, and there was no evidence that the respondent had done so.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages, which covered wages for two hours on his final day and holiday pay. It also upheld the claimant's breach of contract claims, which were pleaded as notice pay and expenses. The judgment records that the claims succeeded as pleaded and does not break the award down between the individual heads of claim.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a gross sum of £618. It then uplifted that sum by two weeks' pay of £462, exercising its discretion because the respondent had not provided the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars in accordance with section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The total sum payable was £1,080.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded in respect of wages for two hours on the claimant's final day and holiday pay. The judgment did not split the award between those elements. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded as pleaded in respect of notice pay and expenses. The judgment did not split the award between those heads of loss. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,080
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47
- Section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.