Case 1800871/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Quigley v Sharrocks and Sons Developments Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1800871/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Quigley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,000. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,000.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,600. Separately, pursuant to section 12(3) ERA 1996, the tribunal made a declaration that the respondent had failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements in contravention of section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £1,000. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,000. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross amount of £1,600. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
| Other | Pursuant to section 12(3) ERA 1996, the tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements in contravention of section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- section 12(3) ERA 1996
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.