Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Tribunal Watch/Care Quality Commission and 11 others/1800872/2022

Case 1800872/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Ms N Montana v Care Quality Commission and 11 others — 2022

Case reference: 1800872/2022
Decision date: 17 May 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Knowles Appearances

Indexed: 25 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms N Montana

Respondent

Care Quality Commission and 11 others

Claims brought

7 categories

Breach of contract
Disability discrimination
Other
Whistleblowing
Religion or belief discrimination
Unfair dismissal
Working time regulations

Source tags (gov.uk)

Breach of Contract
Disability Discrimination
Health & Safety
Public Interest Disclosure
Religion or Belief Discrimination
Unfair Dismissal and Working Time Regulations

Outcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.

Ms N Montana v Care Quality Commission and 11 others — Employment Tribunal 2022 | Tribunal Watch

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Judgment 1 (PDF)
Judgment 2 (PDF)
Judgment 3 (PDF)
Judgment 4 (PDF)
Judgment 5 (PDF)
Judgment 6 (PDF)
Judgment 7 (PDF)
Judgment 8 (PDF)
Judgment 9 (PDF)

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.