Case 1800885/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Procter-Millard v Garrison Security Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800885/2023
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Procter-Millard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 6 February 2023 and heard by video in Leeds on 3 May 2023 before Employment Judge Miller. The respondent, Garrison Security Group Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time and did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. Judgment was entered requiring the respondent to pay the claimant £637.50 gross. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the notes to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £637.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £638 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £638
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.