Mr O Isoze v Lloyds pharmacy — 2022

Case reference: 1800890/2022
Decision date: 8 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr O Isoze

Respondent

Lloyds pharmacy

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. No further reasoning appears in the judgment extract, and the tribunal noted that written reasons would be sent separately.

The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £10,500 as a gross sum. The judgment states that, if any income tax or national insurance contributions were due on that payment, the claimant should account for them.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment states that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. The locked taxonomy does not include a separate 'constructive unfair dismissal' label, so this has been recorded as constructive_dismissal.	Upheld	—	£10,500

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £10,500; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.