Case 1800894/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Franks v Compass Cleaning Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800894/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Franks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 June 2021, the Tribunal gave Mrs P Franks an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal said this was because she had not complied with the order dated 21 April 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal recorded that post was returned marked "return to sender". It concluded that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim, either because of returning post or because she had not told the Tribunal of a new address for contact.
The judgment therefore struck out the claim. No remedy hearing or monetary award is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 21 April 2021 and had not been actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.