Case 1800894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Cammidge v NSS Properties Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800894/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Cammidge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Cammidge brought claims against NSS Properties Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,453.07, identified in the judgment as the amount of those deductions.
The separate breach of contract claim concerned an alleged failure to pay an amount in respect of expenses. The tribunal held that the respondent did not breach the contract of employment in that respect, so the claim failed and was dismissed. No additional remedy was recorded beyond the award for unauthorised deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,453.07, described as the amount of those deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,453 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent did not breach the contract of employment by failing to pay an amount in respect of expenses; this claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,453
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.