Case 1800905/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Henry v Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust Heard: in public by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 1800905/2024
- Decision date
- 6 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Henry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Henry worked for Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust from 1 November 2021 to 31 August 2023. She was disabled by autism and dyslexia, which the respondent accepted. After an Access to Work assessment on 6 April 2022, a report dated 7 April recommended equipment, subscription services, training and coaching. The tribunal found that the respondent did not implement those recommendations, and that the claimant tried to work without the adjustments but became stressed and exhausted.
The issue at this preliminary hearing was whether the disability reasonable-adjustments complaint had been presented in time. The tribunal held that time started on 12 July 2023, when the respondent told the claimant she was being placed on medical suspension, because that was an act inconsistent with making the adjustments. It rejected the respondent's submission that time ran from July 2022, 13 weeks after the Access to Work report. On that basis, the primary time limit expired on 11 October 2023 and early conciliation began on 29 November 2023, making the claim 49 days late.
Applying the just and equitable test under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal extended time. It accepted that the claimant struggled because of her disabilities to complete the relevant forms, had received incorrect advice from her trade union, chose to pursue an internal grievance before issuing proceedings, and experienced delay from her trade union between September and November 2023. The tribunal also found that a 7-week delay was unlikely to affect the cogency of the evidence, that the respondent had not shown any prejudice from the delay, and that the claim had good prospects because the grievance outcome had already accepted that reasonable adjustments had not been made. The respondent's strike-out application on limitation grounds was therefore dismissed and the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal decided the disability reasonable-adjustments complaint was within jurisdiction because time should be extended on a just and equitable basis, and it dismissed the respondent's strike-out application. No final merits determination was made. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link
- Jones v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- Hawkins v Ball
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble and ors
- Rodgers v Bodfari (Transport) Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.