Case 1800926/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Ellis (NASUWT Trade Union Representative) For the v Mrs J Eatock (Solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800926/2021
- Decision date
- 23 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Ellis (NASUWT Trade Union Representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 21, 22 and 23 June 2021 before Employment Judge Rogerson. The judgment records a single claim of unfair dismissal brought by Ms R Scott against John Leggott College.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. No further findings on liability are set out in the extracted judgment text beyond the dismissal of the claim.
The tribunal also made a costs order against the claimant on an indemnity basis in the sum of £8,659.20. The judgment records that the claimant's representative confirmed the claimant, as a member of NASUWT, was expressly indemnified by the union in respect of any costs ordered to be paid to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It also ordered the claimant, on an indemnity basis, to pay the respondent's costs of £8,659.20, noting that the claimant was indemnified by NASUWT in respect of any costs order. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,659
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.