Case 1800948/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Shaw v Care Counts — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800948/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 15 June 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss J Shaw an opportunity to write in or request a hearing to show cause why the claims should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 30 March 2020, the claims had not been actively pursued, and it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing in consequence of those matters.
Miss J Shaw did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment is dated 2 July 2020 and is signed by Employment Judge D N Jones. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that 'the claims' were struck out under rule 37 and does not separate the outcomes by individual claim; unfair dismissal is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that 'the claims' were struck out under rule 37 and does not separate the outcomes by individual claim; disability discrimination is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.