Case 1800963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Allman v DK2 Ventures Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800963/2023
- Decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Allman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 22 March 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Davies determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that DK2 Ventures Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Allman's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £550.00 gross in respect of wages for 3 to 13 October 2022.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £100.00 gross in respect of holiday accrued but not taken when the employment ended. Interest was stated not to be payable in a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. The hearing listed for 3 May 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £550.00 for wages for 3 to 13 October 2022 and £100.00 for holiday accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £650
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.