Case 1800965/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mr E Okhiria, lay presentative (Consultant) For the v Respondent — 2024

Case reference: 1800965/2024
Decision date: 12 July 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge James Representation

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr E Okhiria, lay presentative (Consultant) For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing in Sheffield by video link on 12 July 2024 before Employment Judge James, Mr M N Javed's unfair dismissal claim under s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996 was formally withdrawn on his behalf. The tribunal recorded that claim as dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.

At the same hearing, Mr A Hasan's direct race or religion discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was formally withdrawn on his behalf. The tribunal recorded that claim as dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52. The judgment states that all other claims set out in Annex A to the case management orders sent out after the hearing will proceed to a final hearing between 6 and 13 December 2024.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Mr M N Javed's unfair dismissal claim under s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996 was formally withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.	Withdrawn	—	—
Other	Mr A Hasan's direct race or religion discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was formally withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed on withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013; the judgment uses composite wording and does not isolate a single protected characteristic.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.