Case 1800977/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sean Lawrence v Mr Emmanuel Nuworm AT A HEARING BY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800977/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sean Lawrence
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by telephone conference call on 6 April 2020 before Employment Judge Lancaster, Mr Sean Lawrence appeared in person and Mr Emmanuel Nuworm did not enter an appearance or attend. The tribunal recorded a single finding that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages.
The claim succeeded and the tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant compensation in the gross sum of £1,300.00. The judgment does not separate the award into different heads of loss or set out any additional reasoning beyond the finding of unauthorised deduction and the consequential order for payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,300.00 gross compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.