Case 1800992/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Paul Evans (1) Mrs. Tina Cahill (2) v Central Point Recruitment Limited Heard by CVP On: 17 & 18 December 2020 — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800992/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Paul Evans (1) Mrs. Tina Cahill (2)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Paul Evans' claims were found well founded and he was awarded a total gross sum of £11,394.03. The extracted text records unpaid wages of £6,361.37, holiday pay for 6.9 days of £1,531.18, a 25% ACAS uplift of £2,250.53, and consequential losses of £142.50. The itemised figures in the extracted text do not reconcile with the total stated, so the judgment's total is recorded as given.
The judgment amended the second claimant's name to Mrs Tina Cahill and found her claims well founded. She was awarded a total gross sum of £4,485.85, with the extracted text recording unlawful deductions of £908.14, holiday pay for 7.1 days of £655.40, and one month's notice pay of £2,000. The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Paul Evans was awarded unpaid wages. The judgment also recorded holiday pay, a 25% ACAS uplift, and consequential losses, but the itemised figures in the extracted text do not reconcile with the stated total gross award of £11,394.03. | Upheld | — | £6,361 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 6.9 days was awarded to Mr Paul Evans as part of his well-founded claims. | Upheld | — | £1,531 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Tina Cahill was awarded unlawful deductions. The judgment also recorded holiday pay and one month's notice pay, but the itemised figures in the extracted text do not reconcile with the stated total gross award of £4,485.85. | Upheld | — | £908 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 7.1 days was awarded to Mrs Tina Cahill as part of her well-founded claims. | Upheld | — | £655 |
| Breach of contract | One month's notice pay was awarded to Mrs Tina Cahill. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,880
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.