Case 1800997/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Sunderland v Horizon Academy Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800997/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Sunderland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 issued by Employment Judge JM Wade on 14 July 2020. The claimant was Ms C Sunderland and the respondent was Horizon Academy Trust.
The tribunal recorded that the complaints of indirect sex discrimination were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The tribunal also dismissed the claims brought in relation to the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, again following withdrawal.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to hearing, with the hearing date to be notified after compliance with further orders. No substantive findings on the merits of the remaining claims or any remedy were recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment says the complaint of indirect sex discrimination was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, under rule 52. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Other | The claims in relation to the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The specific sub-provision was not identified in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.