Loading…

Mr Sharples, solicitor v Ms Gould - counsel — Employment Tribunal 2019 | Tribunal Watch

Case 1801003/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr Sharples, solicitor v Ms Gould - counsel — 2019

Case reference: 1801003/2019
Decision date: 2 October 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cox Members
Venue: Leeds
Panel members: Ms L Fawcett, Mr K Smith

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Sharples, solicitor

Respondent

Ms Gould - counsel

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal sat at Leeds on 1 and 2 October 2019 before Employment Judge Cox, with members Ms L Fawcett and Mr K Smith. Its order records that the claim against Centrica plc was dismissed because the claimant confirmed that British Gas Services Limited was the correct respondent to the claim.

The claim against British Gas Services Limited was then dismissed on withdrawal, the parties having reached terms of settlement. The judgment records no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Dismissed after the claimant confirmed that British Gas Services Limited was the correct respondent to the claim.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	Dismissed on withdrawal after the parties reached terms of settlement.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.