Case 1801009/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Hatton v Yvonne Geldard [1] Tallulah’s of Saltaire Limited [2] — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801009/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore
- Panel members
- Mr W Roberts, Mr I W Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Hatton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds by video on 14 and 15 September 2020 before Employment Judge S Shore, sitting with Mr W Roberts and Mr I W Taylor as non-legal members. The claimant was Ms N Hatton and the respondents were Yvonne Geldard and Tallulah’s of Saltaire Limited.
The judgment records that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim failed and her pregnancy discrimination claim failed. It also records that the breach of contract claim and the unauthorised deduction of wages claim were dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary remedy or award is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that this claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that this claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.