Case 1801034/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Newton v IML Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801034/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Newton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the respondent's response under rule 37 after the respondent failed to comply with the Tribunal's order of 6 August 2020 and did not make sufficient written representations in response to the Tribunal's letter of 11 September 2020. Employment Judge Little recorded the judgment on 29 September 2020 and it was sent to the parties on 30 September 2020.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The Tribunal noted that the respondent had admitted, in principle, that it owed wages to the claimant, but it had not provided proof that it was entitled in law to make the deduction by non-payment. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £599.78 forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's response was struck out after it failed to make sufficient representations in response to the Tribunal's letter of 11 September 2020. The Tribunal recorded that the respondent had admitted, in principle, that it owed wages to the claimant but had not provided proof that it was entitled in law to make the deduction by non-payment. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.