Case 1801059/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801059/2019
- Decision date
- 10 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 10 May 2019 before Employment Judge Rogerson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Ms S Firth of counsel. The judgment records no substantive findings on liability because the claims were disposed of by withdrawal.
The complaint of breach of contract, identified as a claim for contractual benefits during the notice period, was withdrawn and dismissed. The complaint of marital discrimination was also withdrawn and dismissed. No remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract (contractual benefits during notice period) was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment describes this as a complaint of marital discrimination. It was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.