Case 1801092/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Bohemian Accountants Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801092/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Hussain, brought complaints against Bohemian Accountants Ltd. The respondent did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge Davies held that Bohemian Accountants Ltd was the correct respondent to the claim.
The tribunal found that the complaints of breach of contract, identified in the judgment as notice pay, unauthorised deduction from wages, and failure to pay for accrued but untaken holiday were well-founded and succeeded. The judgment does not record any rejected liability issues on those claims.
The tribunal awarded the claimant a net sum of £1,292.92. The judgment sets out the calculation relied on to reach that figure: wages owed of £1,670.75, notice pay owed of £1,425.89, and holiday pay owed of £1,778.28, less tax and National Insurance already paid of £566.60 and £369.95, less a loan repayment of £1,000, and less a partial payment of £1,645.45.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract complaint, identified as notice pay, well-founded. The written judgment does not split the overall payment between individual claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded. The written judgment does not split the overall payment between individual claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint for failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday well-founded. The written judgment does not split the overall payment between individual claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,293
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.