Case 1801094/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lane v EMS Engineering Services Limited in voluntary liquidation and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801094/2021
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim that he had not been paid for January and February 2021. The respondent's ET3 gave precise figures of £2,847.53 for January and £739.29 for February, while disputing the obligation to pay them. The claimant confirmed that those were the amounts he sought.
Employment Judge Truscott QC, sitting alone at London South on 19 October 2021, awarded the claimant those sums, making a net award for unpaid wages of £3,586.82.
The judgment also records that the first respondent went into voluntary liquidation on 4 August 2021, and that the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy was added as a respondent under Rule 96. The second respondent was noted as being able to seek reconsideration if so advised.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant said he had not been paid for January and February 2021. The respondent's ET3 set out figures of £2,847.53 for January and £739.29 for February, which the claimant confirmed were the amounts sought. The tribunal awarded those sums. | Upheld | — | £3,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,587
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.