Case 1801097/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Agboola v The Spencer Group — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801097/2019
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Agboola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on limitation only. The Claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy after telling the Respondent he intended to take adoption leave, and he brought claims arising from the dismissal/detriment complaint and direct sex discrimination. The primary deadline for the dismissal-related claims was 20 December 2018, and because ACAS early conciliation ended on 10 January 2019 the effective deadline became 10 February 2019. The claim was submitted on 20 March 2019.
The tribunal found that the Claimant had made an error about the effect of ACAS conciliation and the deadline, believing that the ACAS officer would progress the matter and that the three-month period ran from the certificate. It accepted that he had been dealing at the same time with several significant matters: his father's sudden death on 24 November 2018, the adoption placement of his baby on 6 December 2018, his new employment, and arrangements for his father's funeral. The tribunal also accepted that he had attended the dismissal appeal, had contacted solicitors, had prepared a schedule of loss, and could have filed the claim quickly once he understood he needed to do so himself.
Applying the question of whether it was reasonably practicable to submit the claims in time, and referring to Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser EAT 0165/07, the tribunal concluded that it was not reasonable in all the circumstances to expect him to have done more to ensure timely presentation. It found that he acted promptly once the immediate family and adoption matters had been addressed, and that he submitted the claims the same day he realised the error.
For the sex discrimination claim, the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend time to 20 March 2019. No substantive liability findings were made at this hearing, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held it was not reasonably practicable to present the dismissal claim in time and that the claim was then presented within a further reasonable period. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. This covered the detriment/dismissal complaint linked to the Claimant seeking adoption leave; the tribunal held the same timeliness extension applied. | Other | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend the time limit for the direct sex discrimination claim to 20 March 2019, the date the claim was submitted. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser EAT 0165/07
- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.