Case 1801101/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Brogan v Acorn Mobility Services Ltd Heard By: CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801101/2021
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Brogan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 25 June 2021 before Employment Judge Craft, the tribunal recorded that Mr Brogan's breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice due and his accrued holiday pay claim were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No further findings were given on those withdrawn claims.
The tribunal held that the Claimant was fairly dismissed by Acorn Mobility Services Ltd, and his claim of unfair dismissal was dismissed. The judgment does not set out a separate remedy or award in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the Claimant's unlawful deduction of wages / breach of contract claim failed and was dismissed. The judgment did not record any monetary award, and the only disposition was dismissal of the claims as set out above.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay notice due; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the Claimant was fairly dismissed by the Respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an 'unlawful deduction of wages / breach of contract' claim; it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.