Case 1801102/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Gallagher v Rugby AM Limited and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801102/2019
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss R Gallagher
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short hearing at Leeds on 22 August 2019 before Employment Judge Maidment, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondents represented by counsel. The judgment records the case number as 1801102/2019 and names Rugby AM Limited, Alexander Simmons and Simon Oates as respondents.
The judgment does not set out the substantive complaints in detail. It states only that the claimant's complaints were dismissed upon her withdrawal of them. The record therefore contains no findings on the merits of any alleged breach of contract, discrimination or wage claim.
The dismissal followed the respondents' undertaking not to pursue an application for costs. No remedy award was made, and the judgment contains no compensation, basic award, interest or other monetary figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action. It records that the claimant's complaints were dismissed upon her withdrawal of them, following the respondents' undertaking not to pursue an application for costs. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.