Case 1801117/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person Spanish Interpreter: Mr J McGregor For the v Mr S Messruther, Director — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801117/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person Spanish Interpreter: Mr J McGregor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs M Lopez, worked for the respondent as a cleaner from 11 July 2019 to 14 November 2021. The tribunal found that during the pandemic the claimant's working arrangements changed after a temporary closure and furlough period, and that her guaranteed weekly hours were reduced from 24 to 20 hours by agreement to avoid redundancies. The tribunal also found that she did not protest that change in any event.
On wages, the tribunal reviewed the payslips for the relevant period and identified only two shortfalls that were not explained at the hearing. One was for the week 6 to 12 September 2021, where the claimant was paid for 18 hours plus furlough pay shown on the slip, leaving an apparent shortfall of £3.56. The other was for the week 4 to 10 October 2021, where the payslip showed payment of £175.52, £2.68 short of 20 hours pay. The tribunal accepted that a further underpayment had later been corrected for the final week of employment.
The tribunal concluded that the total wage shortfall was £6.24 and upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, with section 23 providing the tribunal route for recovery. It also found that the claimant was entitled to holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and that, although holiday pay had been paid up to the end of March 2021, there remained an outstanding balance for the period 1 April 2021 to 14 November 2021.
Applying a broad brush calculation and the average pay method over the relevant period, the tribunal found that 3.5 weeks' holiday pay at an average of £196.80 per week came to £688.80. After crediting the claimant with holiday pay already paid for that period, the outstanding holiday pay was £243.30. The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £249.54 gross in total, less tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim upheld under s.13 and s.23 ERA 1996 for an identified wage shortfall of £6.24. | Upheld | — | £6 |
| Holiday pay | Claim upheld under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for unpaid holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £243 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulations 13, 13A, 14 and 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.