Case 1801132/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Ramm v Horton Green Day Nursery — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801132/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flanagan
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Ramm
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal via CVP on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge Flanagan sitting alone. The claimant, Mrs C Ramm, brought claims against Horton Green Day Nursery for unlawful deduction from wages, accrued but unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and breach of contract for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay.
The tribunal held that each claim was not well founded. It dismissed the unlawful deduction from wages claim, dismissed the Working Time Regulations claim concerning accrued but unpaid holiday pay, and dismissed the breach of contract claim covering unpaid holiday pay and notice pay. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states this claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states this claim for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.