Case 1801144/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Harman v S Brierley & Sons Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801144/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Harman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Sheffield on 18 August 2020, Employment Judge Little found that Mrs T Harman had been dismissed by S Brierley & Sons Ltd and that the dismissal was unfair. The judgment records the effective date of termination as 10 January 2020.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,229.28 and a compensatory award of £2,155.65. The compensatory award was made up of £1,593.55 for loss of earnings after taking account of a credit for extra earnings from a second job and an overpayment by the respondent, plus £500 for loss of statutory rights and £62.10 for dental costs that would otherwise have been covered by a health insurance policy. The tribunal also applied the Recoupment Regulations, recording a monetary award of £6,384.93, a prescribed element of £1,593.55 for the period from 10 January 2020 to 9 March 2020, and the balance above the prescribed element as £4,791.38.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,385
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,229
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,156
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.