Case 1801153/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Zurek & others (see attached schedule) v J Rotherham Masonry Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801153/2020
- Decision date
- 17 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Zurek & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBecause no response had been received from the respondent and there was no indication that the claims would be defended, the Tribunal issued judgment pursuant to Rule 21. It declared that J Rotherham Masonry Limited (in administration) had failed to comply with ss.188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award for the claimants on the attached schedule who had been dismissed as redundant on 4 February 2020. The award covered a 90-day period beginning on that date, but the extracted judgment does not state a monetary figure.
The Tribunal also disposed of the individual complaints. Mr K Zurek's complaints under case nos. 1801153/20 and 1802405/20 were dismissed upon withdrawal. Mr P Glowaty's complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract under case no. 1801154/20 were dismissed because they were not being actively pursued, although he remained included in the attached schedule of claimants benefitting from the protective award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to comply with ss.188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award for the claimants on the attached schedule who were dismissed as redundant on 4 February 2020. No monetary sum is stated in the extracted judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause of action. The judgment states that Mr K Zurek's complaints under case nos. 1801153/20 and 1802405/20 were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Mr P Glowaty's unfair dismissal complaint under case no. 1801154/20 was dismissed because it was not being actively pursued. He remained included in the attached schedule for the protective award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mr P Glowaty's breach of contract complaint under case no. 1801154/20 was dismissed because it was not being actively pursued. He remained included in the attached schedule for the protective award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.