Case 1801160/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Mr Wayne Ghosh (Director) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801160/2022
- Decision date
- 4 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge Rogerson. The claimant, Ms P. Bastian, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Wayne Ghosh, a director of the respondent company. The judgment records two case numbers, 1801160/2022 and 1801168/2022, and deals with wage, notice and holiday pay issues arising on termination of employment.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent had not paid the claimant for February 2022 plus 6 extra hours worked, and ordered payment of £2,247 gross. It also upheld the breach of contract claim in relation to notice, finding that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarding £542 gross as damages.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for outstanding holiday pay on termination. It found that 6 days' holiday entitlement remained outstanding, calculated on the basis of 4 months' complete service at 1.66 days per month less 1 day's leave taken, and ordered payment of £650 gross. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £3,439 gross in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for February 2022 plus 6 extra hours worked and ordered payment of £2,247 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,247 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £542 gross. | Upheld | — | £542 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 6 days' holiday entitlement outstanding on termination of employment, calculated as 4 months' complete service at 1.66 days per month less 1 day's leave taken, and ordered payment of £650 gross. | Upheld | — | £650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,439
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.