Case 1801169/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Radwanska v Ryan Foods Plus Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801169/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Radwanska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge JM Wade at Leeds on 16 June 2021. The judgment records a consent judgment rather than a contested determination. The parties agreed that no payment had been made in respect of a payslip declaring a payment to the claimant on 31 December 2020.
On that basis, the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint in relation to December 2020 pay succeeded at least to the extent recorded in the judgment. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £261.24. The judgment states that this was without prejudice to the claimant's further allegations, but it does not determine any further claims or set out additional findings beyond the agreed wages point.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment. The parties agreed that no payment had been made in respect of a payslip declaring a payment to the claimant on 31 December 2020. | Upheld | — | £261 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £261
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.