Case 1801171/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Obillo v Care 4 J Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801171/2021
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Obillo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short strike-out decision and does not determine any underlying substantive employment claim. It records that by an order sent on 23 September 2021 the Tribunal gave Ms J Obillo an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the proceedings had been conducted unreasonably, that the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 16 March 2021 and 29 June 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge D N Jones ordered that the claim be struck out. No remedy, liability finding, or damages award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out after the claimant did not make sufficient representations in response to an order dated 23 September 2021. The reasons given were unreasonable conduct of the proceedings, non-compliance with Tribunal orders dated 16 March 2021 and 29 June 2021, and failure to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.