Case 1801186/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Almond v Victorguard Care plc and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801186/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Almond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 8 March 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster, the tribunal heard the matter partly remotely by CVP. The written judgment records that the claim against the First Respondent, Victorguard Care plc, was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also refused the Claimant's application to strike out the Second Respondent's response. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary remedy.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the face of the written decision, the only recorded disposals are withdrawal of the claim against the First Respondent and refusal of the strike-out application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claim against the First Respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal. The case listing identified the matter as unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not set out the underlying claim in detail. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.