Case 1801194/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 1801194/2021 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on and November 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr Stuart Bell v Represented by: Ms M Gribbon, Solicitor Al- Murad D.I.Y. Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801194/2021
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 1801194/2021 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on and November 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr Stuart Bell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in which Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn recorded that the complaints brought by Mr Stuart Bell had been withdrawn by him. The case was heard by CVP on 8 and 9 November 2021, with judgment dated 10 November 2021 and entered in the register on 11 November 2021.
Because the complaints had been withdrawn, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the pleaded complaints, and it does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the complaints brought by the claimant had been withdrawn by him and that the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.