Case 1801196/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Dack v Mr P Bleach trading as Rendezvous Cafe Heard: By CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801196/2021
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Dack
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing before Employment Judge JM Wade on 2 to 4 March 2022, Mrs N Dack's complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were dismissed, and Mr Bleach's counterclaim was also dismissed. The tribunal therefore rejected the dismissal claims in full.
The unlawful deductions complaint was dismissed except in relation to an attendance at work on 12 October 2020, and the accrued holiday pay claim on termination succeeded. The judgment awarded £395.85, described as seven days' gross pay, but did not split that figure between the successful holiday pay claim and the limited unlawful deduction allowance.
The tribunal then increased that award by a further £615.76 because the respondent had not provided the claimant with a statement of employment particulars. It also recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply to the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Complaint of constructive unfair dismissal dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Complaint of wrongful dismissal dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's counterclaim dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint dismissed save in respect of an attendance at work on 12 October 2020; the judgment did not separately quantify that element. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay on termination succeeded; the judgment awarded £395.85 but did not split that figure between this claim and the limited unlawful deduction allowance. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,012
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,012
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.