Case 1801215/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Ochonma v CTS Recruitment — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801215/2022
- Decision date
- 11 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Ochonma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Respondent said it did not employ Mr S Ochonma and that he had named the wrong company in his claim. By a letter dated 25 March 2022, the Tribunal asked the claimant for his comments on that assertion, but he did not reply.
The Tribunal then sent a further opportunity on 28 April 2022 for the claimant to explain why the claim should not be struck out because he had not responded to the earlier letter and the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant again did not respond.
In light of the absence of any response, the Tribunal found that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued and struck it out. The listed hearing on Monday 16 May 2022 was cancelled. No substantive liability finding or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying wages claim. It states that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal’s letters and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.