Case 1801221/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Duncan v Clearance and Clear up Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801221/2022
- Decision date
- 26 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms L Fawcett, Mr G Corbett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds and hearing the case on 23, 24 and 25 November 2022, gave a unanimous judgment that Mr T Duncan's claims of disability discrimination against Clearance and Clear up Ltd were well founded and succeeded. The decision records that Mr Duncan appeared in person and the respondent was represented by an HR consultant.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings in the extracted text provided, but it does record the liability outcome in full. The tribunal directed that a further hearing would be listed to deal with remedy, and that separate case management orders would be issued for that purpose.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claims of disability discrimination were unanimously found well founded and succeeded. Remedy was deferred to a further hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.