Case 1801229/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801229/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Watford hearing on 8 October 2019, Employment Judge R Lewis recorded that the respondent conceded two monetary claims. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay and ordered payment of the agreed sum of £308.85. It also found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s pay and ordered payment of the agreed sum of £280.77.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s claim under s.11 Employment Relations Act 1999, which concerned the right to be accompanied. The claimant’s application for a costs order was also refused. No separate remedy was awarded for the rejected claim, and the judgment does not record any further award beyond the two conceded sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent conceded liability and the tribunal ordered payment of the agreed sum. | Upheld | — | £309 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent conceded that unlawful deductions had been made and the tribunal ordered payment of the agreed sum. | Upheld | — | £281 |
| Other | Claim under s.11 Employment Relations Act 1999 (right to be accompanied) rejected. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £590
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.