Case 1801239/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Mellor v Louise Armitage (Ginis Boutique) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1801239/2024
- Decision date
- 29 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Mellor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns Miss N Mellor's unfair dismissal complaint against Louise Armitage (Ginis Boutique). The Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 16 October 2024, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had insufficient service and did not have the unfair dismissal right.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment also states that the remaining claims were to continue to a hearing on 13 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | By letter dated 16 October 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had insufficient service and did not have the unfair dismissal right. No sufficient representations or hearing request was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.